DWI Conviction in NJ reversed because State failed to turn over Alcotest repair logs

September 1st, 2010 Edward Harrington Heyburn Comments off

On August 31, 2010, in an unpublished opinion, the Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division reversed a lower court conviction for DWI/DUI where the State failed to turn over historical data and repair logs for the police Alcotest. State of New Jersey v. Maricic. While these documents are not foundational documents necessary for the State to obtain a conviction, they are documents that would challenge the reliability of the Alcotest.  This case begs the question of what happens when the State says that they do not have repair logs.  For a long time, the State has been able to shirk its responsibility to turn over repair logs by denying that any such documents exist.  Now that the appellate division says Defendants are entitled to such documents, the fight to show that the State fails to properly maintain repair logs in on!

Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/NJInjuryLawyer

  • Personal Injury
  • Workers Compensation
  • Criminal Matters
  • Traffic Matters
  • DWI/DUI
  • Municipal Court
  • Family Law, Divorce, Custody and DYFS Cases.

Call for a free consultation!  (609) 259-7600

37 Robbinsville-Allentown Road, Robbinsville, NJ  08691
Tel. (609) 259-7600  Fax (609) 259-7303

heyburn@heyburnlaw.com

Can you really be fired for anything?

The short answer is no!  Some say New Jersey is a right to work state which really means a right to be fired state. Some employers cloak their discriminatory intent under this guise.  When the cloak is peeled back, we can often see that their true reason for firing an employee violated the law.  “To establish a prima facie case of discriminatory discharge, the plaintiff must prove:(1) that he or she is a member of a protected group;(2) that he or she was performing his job at a level that met his [or her] employer’s legitimate expectations;(3) that he or she was nevertheless fired; and (4) that the employer sought someone to perform the same work after he or she left.”- in McConnell v. State Farm Mut. Ins. Co., 1999  By way of example, if a law firm was run by three partners (two Jewish and one Protestant) and these partners fired a series of Catholic lawyers, the Catholic lawyers would have a cause of action for wrongful termination because someone’s religion is a protected category.  Often, the employer will make false allegations like the employee stole a fee when the employers true intent is to discriminate against someone for their religous beliefs.

Follow me on Twitter:  http://twitter.com/NJInjuryLawyer

  • Personal Injury
  • Workers Compensation
  • Criminal Matters
  • Traffic Matters
  • DWI/DUI
  • Municipal Court
  • Family Law, Divorce, Custody and DYFS Cases.

 Call for a free consultation!  (609) 259-7600

37 Robbinsville-Allentown Road, Robbinsville, NJ  08691
Tel. (609) 259-7600  Fax (609) 259-7303
heyburn@heyburnlaw.com

Have you been defamed? Fact v. Opinion

Libel and slander are terms used by the public interchangeably but have different meanings.  They both fall under the action we call defamation.  Libel is when someone defames another in writing while slander is when someone defames you in spoken word.  “At the heart of every action for libel or defamation is the threshold issue of whether the language used is reasonably susceptible of a defamatory meaning. It is well established that that question is one of law to be resolved by the court. Herrmann v. Newark Morning Ledger Co., 48 N.J. Super. 420, 429-30 (App.Div. 1958). Likewise, the critical issue in this case — whether the letter in question amounted to a statement of fact or an expression of opinion — is a question of law for the court. Rinaldi v. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 42 N.Y.2d 369, 380, 366 N.E.2d 1299, 1306, 397 N.Y.S.2d 943, 950, cert. den., 434 U.S. 969, 98 S.Ct. 514, 54 L.Ed.2d 456 (1977). As a preliminary matter we therefore emphasize that the summary judgment procedure is particularly well suited to this sensitive area of First Amendment Law.” Kotlikoff v. The Community News, 89 N.J. 62 (1982). 

Many times these issues arise in the workplace.  For instance if your employer falsely accuses you of stealing money and tells your co-workers you stole money that would be slander.  If they put the same comments in writing, it would be libel.  If your employer said “in their opinion,” you are a thief, this would not be defamation.  It is merely their opinion.  If you have questions about defamation, please call me to discuss your rights and options.

Follow me on Twitter:  http://twitter.com/NJInjuryLawyer

  • Personal Injury
  • Workers Compensation
  • Criminal Matters
  • Traffic Matters
  • DWI/DUI
  • Municipal Court
  • Family Law, Divorce, Custody and DYFS Cases.

 Call for a free consultation!  (609) 259-7600

37 Robbinsville-Allentown Road, Robbinsville, NJ  08691
Tel. (609) 259-7600  Fax (609) 259-7303
heyburn@heyburnlaw.com
Categories: Personal Injury Tags:

Too embarassed to sue?

When a person sues another person for injuries or damages, they may open up private details of their life for the public to see.  Sometimes the concern for privacy will prevent a person from suing.  New Jersey Courts will let someone file a complaint anonymously to prevent the public from learning their identity or personal details of their claim.  Anonymous pleading is rare but permitted.

For instance, in Whalen v. Roe, 429 U.S. 589, 591, 97S.Ct. 869, 872, 51 L.Ed.2d 64, 68 (1977), a state statute was upheld that required a centralized computer file record of names and addresses of people who had obtained certain prescription drugs for which there was also an unlawful market. Cf. Doe v. City of New York, 15 F.3d 264 (2nd Cir.1994) (agency publicly disclosed the settlement terms of HIV infected plaintiff’s discrimination claim in accordance with New York City law despite a confidentiality clause in the settlement agreement; court determined that under the agreement plaintiff had a right to confidentiality in his HIV status, and it did not “automatically become a public record when he filed his claim with the Commission and entered into the Conciliation Agreement”); James v. Jacobson, 6 F.3d 233, 234-235 (4th Cir.1993) (plaintiffs allowed to proceed anonymously where they alleged that *503 their infertility doctor artificially inseminated plaintiff-wife with his own sperm rather than plaintiff-husband’s sperm); Doe v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Rhode Island, 794 F. Supp. 72 (D.R.I. 1992) (transsexual allowed to proceed anonymously against medical insurer in claim for reimbursement of sex change expenses); United States v. Westinghouse Electric Corp., 638 F.2d 570, 581-582 (3rd Cir.1980) (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health permitted to obtain employee medical records so long as employees had prior notice and an opportunity to object).

Follow me on Twitter:  http://twitter.com/NJInjuryLawyer

  • Personal Injury
  • Workers Compensation
  • Criminal Matters
  • Traffic Matters
  • DWI/DUI
  • Municipal Court
  • Family Law, Divorce, Custody and DYFS Cases.

 Call for a free consultation!  (609) 259-7600

37 Robbinsville-Allentown Road, Robbinsville, NJ  08691
Tel. (609) 259-7600  Fax (609) 259-7303
heyburn@heyburnlaw.com
Categories: Personal Injury Tags:

Not Guilty – Mercer County Jury Exhonerates Hightstown Man of Aggravated Sexual Assault

August 13, 2010 – After a two (2) week trial, Edward Harrington Heyburn, Esq. convinced a Mercer County jury that a Hightstown man was not guilty of Aggravated Sexual Assault and related charges.  It took the jury approximately four (4) hours of deliberation before it returned a not guilty verdict to each of the six (6) charges levied by the State.  What the jury did not hear is that in 2009, a Monmouth County jury refused to indict Mr. Heyburn’s client for the same allegations that the “alleged victim” made in Roosevelt, New Jersey.  Hon. Pedro Jimenez not only refused to tell the jury that the defendant was not indicted but allowed the State to introduce evidence of the unindicted charges to explain why the “alleged victim” did not report her story to the police for over a decade.

After the trial, Ed Heyburn said, “It was clear that the ‘alleged victim’ fabricated her story.  She gave approximately seven different versions that were all inconsistent with each other.”  The New Jersey State Police which patrols Roosevelt, spearheaded the investigation.  Trooper Jessica Baker conceded on the stand that Mr. Heyburn’s client maintained his innocence even after that State Police lied to him. Trooper Baker admitted that it is a common tactic for the New Jersey State Police to lie to suspects to gain a confession.  She and Det. Rosica said they had DNA evidence from semen in his pants. They advised him that he had left the pants at the house after a sexual assault.  Mr. Heyburn’s client, embraced by innocence, told the New Jersey State Police to test the pants because there is no way that his semen could be in the victim’s house.

On cross examination, Mr. Heyburn forced Trooper Jessica Baker to admit that the entire victim statement only lasted 20 minutes.  Furthermore, despite the “alleged victim’s” accusations that the client ejaculated on her hand over 1,000 times, the New Jersey State Police never went to the scene where she said the abuse occurred.  The State Police never looked for semen stains on the rug or a stuffed doll the mother kept from when the “alleged victim” was young.

In an effort to save their case, the State called Lynn Taska, Ph.D.  Dr. Taska is a psycologist from Metuchen that testifies to explain why an “alleged” victim of sexual assault may give inconsistent statements and testify to facts that never occurred.  Interestingly, Dr. Taska offered, on crossexamination, that a “real victim” of sexual assault may be raped by one person and blame a completely innocent person.  This left the door open for the possibility that the State’s complaintant was raped but by someone other than Mr. Heyburn’s client.

The not guilty verdict was the first step in restoring Mr. Heyburn’s client’s reputation.

This case is proof that justice can only be obtained when you hire a trial attorney who is ready, willing and able to defend you before a jury of your peers.

Follow me on Twitter:  http://twitter.com/NJInjuryLawyer

  • Personal Injury
  • Workers Compensation
  • Criminal Matters
  • Traffic Matters
  • DWI/DUI
  • Municipal Court
  • Family Law, Divorce, Custody and DYFS Cases.

 Call for a free consultation!  (609) 259-7600

37 Robbinsville-Allentown Road, Robbinsville, NJ  08691
Tel. (609) 259-7600  Fax (609) 259-7303
heyburn@heyburnlaw.com

Shoplifting in New Jersey – No longer a minor offense

In New Jersey, what acts are counted as shoplifting?

Taking away merchandise with the intention of paying less than the full price to the merchant Hiding merchandise on your body or something you’re carrying with the intention of not paying for it. Removing, altering, or transferring a price tag with the intention of paying less than the full price to the merchant. Transferring merchandise from the container in which it’s displayed to another container with the intention of paying less than the full price to the merchant (for example, putting a small item inside a large item and only paying for the larger item)
Under-ringing with the intention of paying less than the full price to the merchant
Removing a shopping cart with the intention of not returning it
Intention? How do I prove someone “intended” not to pay me?

There is a presumption in the law that if you find unpurchased merchandise hidden on someone or in their belongings, that he or she hid it deliberately and intends not to pay for it.

What are the penalties for shoplifting?

It depends on the “full retail value” of the merchandise that was stolen.

  • 2nd Degree, if the full retail value of property is $75,000 or more; penalties are imprisonment of 5-10 years and fine up to $150,000
  • 3rd Degree; if the full retail value is over $500 but less than $75,000; penalties are imprisonment of 3-5 years and a fine up to $15,000
  • 4th Degree; if the full retail value of of the property is between $200 and $500; penalties are imprisonment up to 18 mos. and a fine up to $10,000
  • Disorderly Persons Offense; if the full retail value of of the property is under $200; penalties include imprisonment up to 6 mos. and a fine up to $1,000

Additional mandatory penalties include:

for a first offense, at least 10 days of community service
for a second offense, at least 15 days of community service
for a third or subsequent offense, up to 25 days of community service AND imprisonment for no less than 90 days

Looking at Juror’s bias is key in criminal acquittals!

Top 10 States for Speeding Tickets

U.S. News & World Report warns drivers which states they are most likely get a speeding ticket. Speeder Be Ware!

Call for a free consultation!  (609) 259-7600

37 Robbinsville-Allentown Rd
Robbinsville, NJ  08691
Tel. (609) 259-7600  Fax (609) 259-7303

heyburn@heyburnlaw.com

Domestic Violence and Seizure of “Weapons”

 

If you are charged with an act of domestic violence, any weapons you have will probably be seized.  What you will be surprised to find out is what the Prosecutor’s Office considers a weapon.  It may be your car, a laptop, cell phone or your favorite Ipod.  You may also be surprised to find out that you may never get these items back even if you are exonherated of the charges.

In essence, there are three ways in which weapons can be returned. First, if the domestic violence complaint is dismissed and no probable cause exists to indict the aggressor. Second, the person who subjects the victim to domestic violence had any charges pending against him/her dismissed. The last remaining option is whether, even if the charges against the defendant were dismissed, and the domestic violence complaint was dismissed and no probable cause existed to indict the defendant, the court, after holding a hearing, determines there still existed some underlying reason to seize the weapons to protect the victim of the domestic violence, i.e. a violent situation no longer existed.  If you are found not guilty or the charges are dismissed than the Prosecutor can ask for a hearing and argue that you are unfit to get your property/weapon back.

Call for a free consultation!  (609) 259-7600

37 Robbinsville-Allentown Road, Robbinsville, NJ  08691
Tel. (609) 259-7600  Fax (609) 259-7303
heyburn@heyburnlaw.com

An Innocent Man Freed Today

Edward Harrington Heyburn successfully convinced the Mercer County Prosecutor’s Office to dismiss 2nd Degree Armed Robbery charges against a Pennsylvania man on March 16, 2010.  The client has been incarcerated in the Mercer County Correctional Center since the Fall of 2009.  In the underlying case, the State alleged that the Pennsylvania man used a gun to rob approximately $200 from a Trenton resident on his way to the train station.  During the course of Mr. Heyburn’s investigation, it was discovered that the alleged victim had a cell phone and did not call police immediately after the incident.  It also appeared that the alleged victim walked past NJ Transit Police at the train station, never telling them he was robbed.  The alleged victim did not call the police until after he boarded the train and called his mother to tell her what happened.

Earlier this year Ed Heyburn demanded trial and advised the Court that his client had three (3) alibi witnesses that placed him in Pennsylvania when the incident was alleged to have occurred.  After Judge Osterer called the matter in for trial, the State dismissed the charge.

This case is proof that justice can only be obtained when you hire a trial attorney who is ready, willing and able to defend you before a jury of your peers.

Follow me on Twitter:  http://twitter.com/NJInjuryLawyer

  • Personal Injury
  • Workers Compensation
  • Criminal Matters
  • Traffic Matters
  • DWI/DUI
  • Municipal Court
  • Family Law, Divorce, Custody and DYFS Cases.

 

 

 

 

Call for a free consultation!  (609) 259-7600

37 Robbinsville-Allentown Road, Robbinsville, NJ  08691
Tel. (609) 259-7600  Fax (609) 259-7303
heyburn@heyburnlaw.com
1 visitors online now
0 guests, 1 bots, 0 members
Max visitors today: 12 at 12:13 am EDT
This month: 12 at 09-04-2010 12:13 am EDT
This year: 31 at 08-09-2010 03:10 am EDT
All time: 31 at 08-09-2010 03:10 am EDT

Plugin by: Online Movies